Kalshi Wants $40B, Blockchain.com Wants an IPO, and Crypto Treasuries Are Losing Their Magic
Kalshi is reportedly chasing a $40 billion valuation and Blockchain.com is lining up a public listing, but the companies whose entire pitch was 'we hold crypto on our balance sheet' are watching their premiums evaporate. The private market and the public market have never disagreed this loudly.
JUST IN: crypto's private valuations are ripping again while the public ones are getting gutted, and nobody wants to say that out loud.
Kalshi, the prediction market everyone suddenly cares about, is reportedly shopping a round that would value it around $40 billion. Blockchain.com is laying the groundwork for an IPO. Meanwhile the entire cohort of crypto treasury companies, the ones that spent two years telling shareholders they were a better way to own Bitcoin than just buying Bitcoin, is watching that pitch fall apart in real time.
Three headlines. One brutal theme. The money is back. The premium isn't.
The Timeline
Start with where Kalshi was a year ago. The company closed a round near $11 billion back in late 2025, which felt absurd at the time. A prediction market, valued in the double-digit billions, for letting people bet on Fed decisions and election outcomes. Then election volumes exploded, sports contracts opened up, and the whole category went from novelty to infrastructure faster than anyone modeled.
So $40 billion isn't a random number. It's roughly a 4x markup in under twelve months. That's the kind of step-up you see when a company thinks it's about to be the default venue for pricing real world events.
Blockchain.com's timing tells the same story from a different angle. The wallet and exchange business has been around since 2011, survived multiple winters, and spent the last two cycles getting written off. Now it's reportedly eyeing a public listing. You don't file for an IPO when you think the window is closing.
And then there's the other half of the market. Strategy, the original Bitcoin treasury company, has been the bellwether since 2020. Its whole model: sell stock or debt at a premium to net asset value, use the proceeds to buy more Bitcoin, let the per-share coin count grow. It worked beautifully for years. Then the premium compressed. Then it kept compressing. By late 2025, the multiple-to-NAV was flirting with parity, and rumblings about the company's own balance sheet math started showing up in sell-side notes.
The copycats had it worse. Metaplanet in Japan, the various smaller US treasury vehicles, the ones that IPO'd in 2025 with a Bitcoin chart on slide three and nothing else. Most of them now trade at or below the value of the coins they hold. Which means the entire reason to own them over spot Bitcoin has vanished.
What Actually Broke
Here's the thing about the treasury trade. It only works if the premium exists. The premium is the product. Once it's gone, you're just a leveraged Bitcoin fund with overhead, a board, and SEC filings.
So who wins? Private venues. Kalshi, Blockchain.com, the exchanges, the data providers. They get priced on revenue and growth and narrative, and right now the narrative is scorching. Prediction markets pulled in record volumes through the 2026 election cycle, and every sportsbook that wanted a crypto angle is now a Kalshi partner or competitor. That's a real business with real take rates.
Who loses? The retail investor who bought a treasury company at 2x NAV in early 2025 because a guy on YouTube said it was 'Bitcoin with a yield.' That person is down badly relative to just owning BTC. And the company itself is now stuck. It can't issue shares accretively at parity. It can't buy more coins without diluting. The flywheel stops when the premium does.
And just like that, an entire business model that looked like genius for four years looks like a rounding error.
Traders are watching closely for a second-order effect here too. If treasury companies stop buying, some of the steady bid under Bitcoin disappears. Not all of it. Not even most of it. But a chunk of the 2024 and 2025 rally was corporate balance sheet demand, and that demand is now conditional on a premium that no longer exists. That's not a crash thesis. It's a 'who's the marginal buyer now' problem.
What Comes Next
Watch two things.
First, whether Kalshi's round actually clears at $40 billion. If it does, every prediction market competitor suddenly has a fundraise narrative and the whole sector reprices upward. If it comes in at $25 billion or stalls entirely, you'll know the private market got ahead of itself again. The round either closes in the next couple of quarters or it doesn't. There's no in-between that looks good.
Second, Blockchain.com's filing. If the S-1 lands, read the revenue mix. Exchange fees, wallet monetization, institutional services. If a big slice of revenue is transaction-based, expect a discount to peers. If it's subscription or custody-based, expect a warmer reception. That distinction is going to matter more than the Bitcoin price on the day it prices.
As for the treasury companies, the number to watch is net asset value. Any sustained trade above 1.5x NAV and the flywheel restarts. Below 1x and you'll see buybacks, mergers, or quiet liquidations. Several of the 2025 vintage vehicles probably don't survive the decade. That's not pessimism, that's just math.
The market's verdict so far: it will pay up for venues and cash flow. It won't pay up for a wrapper around an asset you can buy in three taps on your phone.
This changes things. Crypto's next leg isn't going to be carried by balance sheet games. It's going to be carried by companies that actually sell something. The ones that don't are about to find out what happens when the premium goes to zero.
Explore More
Key Terms Explained
An approval term meaning authentic, bold, or worthy of respect.
The first cryptocurrency, created in 2009 by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto.
A distributed database where transactions are grouped into blocks and linked together cryptographically.
Who holds and controls your crypto assets.