Ethereum Scraps Hoodi's Oct. 26 Glamsterdam Activation Over EIP-8037 Contract Clash
Developers pulled the October 26 Glamsterdam activation on Hoodi, along with the Gloas consensus change and a planned gas limit hike to 200 million. No new epoch has been named, and operators are being told to stop trusting the old compatibility tables.
Ethereum's next testnet milestone just slipped. Developers have removed the October 26 Glamsterdam activation from Hoodi's schedule, wiping out a target set for 17:42:48 UTC at epoch 132,352, and they haven't named a replacement.
The stated reason is EIP-8037. Specifically, the Ethereum Foundation wants more time to understand how the proposal behaves alongside smart contracts already live on mainnet. Here's what the filing actually says: this isn't one activation flag being flipped off. The Amsterdam execution-layer activation is gone, the Gloas consensus-layer activation is gone with it, and so is the companion plan to raise Hoodi's gas limit to 200 million at that epoch.
That third item is the one infrastructure teams should underline twice. Upgrades only work when every client agrees on the same block. If one validator leaves an obsolete October 26 schedule hard-coded while the rest of the network drops it, you don't get a harmless config mismatch. You get a chain incompatibility. The Foundation has told operators to pull fresh instructions for both execution and consensus clients, and to stop assuming the earlier compatibility tables still hold.
For ETH holders, the immediate read is close to a non-event. Mainnet keeps running under its existing rules, no confirmed Hoodi transactions have been rolled back, and nobody has announced a mainnet date moving. But the upgrade calendar is softer than the market assumed, and any team with an October runbook needs to reset it now.
Is a pause a bad look? I don't think so. A compatibility question surfacing in testing is the outcome you want, and it's a lot cheaper than discovering it after real economic activity depends on the new rules. The precedent here's important: Ethereum would rather absorb a scheduling hit than ship an ambiguous rule change.
Watch for three things before anyone calls this resolved, a documented diagnosis of the EIP-8037 conflict, revised client releases, and a fresh Hoodi activation epoch. Until all three exist, the Glamsterdam timeline is unset.
Explore More
Key Terms Explained
A bundle of transactions that gets permanently added to the blockchain.
A fixed period of time in a blockchain's operation, typically used in proof-of-stake networks.
A blockchain platform that enabled smart contracts and decentralized applications.
The fee paid to process transactions on Ethereum and similar blockchains.