Cantor Says Securitize Doubles From Here. The Signal Isn't the Target.
Cantor Fitzgerald opened coverage on Securitize with an overweight rating and a $21.20 price target, implying 95% upside from Friday's $10.86 close. The real story isn't the number. It's that a traditional bank is now modeling tokenized equities as a revenue line.
Cantor Fitzgerald just put a 95% upside target on the company that's moving stocks onto blockchains.
$21.20 a share. Securitize closed Friday at $10.86. Cantor opened coverage Monday with an overweight rating. That's not a hedge. That's a firm planting a flag.
Here's the thing. Securitize isn't some DeFi lab experiment. It turns stocks, funds, and private credit into blockchain tokens. Real assets. Real issuers. The boring middle of finance that nobody tweets about.
And Cantor, the same shop that's been building deep in crypto custody and infrastructure, picked this moment to put a number on it.
What's Actually Being Priced
Look at the scale. Securitize sits on roughly $39 billion in tokenized assets and pipeline. The wider market for securities that could plausibly move onchain gets measured in the hundreds of trillions. $319 trillion is the number floating around.
Is every share of every company going onchain next year? No. Obviously not.
But you don't need all of it. You need a sliver. One percent of a $319 trillion market is $3.19 trillion. Securitize takes a cut of that flow, and suddenly $21.20 looks cheap.
Anon, let me explain. Wall Street has spent three years talking about tokenization at conferences. Panels. White papers. Endless "future of markets" keynotes. What it hasn't done is rate the companies actually doing the work.
Cantor just did. That's the signal. Not the target itself. The fact that a traditional investment bank is now modeling tokenized equity as a line item with real revenue behind it.
Who benefits? Securitize, clearly. But also the exchanges, the custodians, the transfer agents, the compliance shops. Anyone who touches settlement. Tokenized stocks settle in seconds, not T+1. That's not a feature. That's a business model with a price tag attached.
Who loses? The middlemen who charge rent on friction. Clearing houses, back-office vendors, anyone whose margin comes from the two-day gap between a trade and a transfer. Their moat is a delay. Delays are fixable.
I've been saying this for weeks. The real tokenization trade isn't stablecoins. Stablecoins already won that fight. The next leg is equities. And equities are a much bigger pool.
What To Watch
Three things.
First, does anyone follow Cantor? One overweight rating is a data point. Two or three from bulge bracket names turns it into a trend. Watch the initiation calendar over the next quarter.
Second, revenue. Securitize needs to show issuance growing quarter over quarter. Ratings mean nothing if assets under management stall out. The $21.20 case assumes compounding, not a one-time bump.
Third, regulation. Tokenized equities live and die on whether the SEC lets them trade like securities without strangling the rails. Every bit of clarity is upside. Every delay is a tax on the thesis.
Real talk: this is bigger than people realize. Not because Securitize doubles. Because the biggest names in traditional finance just admitted that putting stocks onchain is a business worth modeling out loud.
The chain doesn't lie. And now neither does the sell side.